All you poor people who use Windows, this one's for you.
Red Hat vs. SuSE vs. Mandrake vs. FreeBSD vs. Darwin (MacOS X)
Coming soon: Revised, revisited version with FC4, SuSE9.3, MDK10.2/2006ALPHA, FreeBSD 5.3.x, Darwin 7.8.x, Gentoo 2005.1, Debian Sarge, Xandros, Slackware 10.1, Ubuntu and a whole lot more!I view red Hat as the perfect OS for Linux newcomers. It combines ease of use with the strength and flexability of Linux.
Red Hat comes in two flavors; Fedora and Enterprise Edition.
Fedora is the free version, a completely GPL community based OS. Some (Ok a lot) of people are hesitant to try Fedora Core, as the entire GPL community was shaken by the cancelation of RH9, however I have used both and believe that RH standard edition never really died, it just was given a new name. Fedora is basically RH9 plus newer software, kernal, GUI, Window manager, etc.
FC is highly reccomended for any Linux newcomer (it maintained the ease of use from RH9) or anyone who's sick of RH9 but isn't ready to switch distributions.
Enterprise is the other RH9 derivative. Although I believe Fedora is completely worthy of business managment, I have also heard some
very good things about Enterprise Edition. Also, RHEL is the best supported Linux OS out there.
Conclusion: Although many of RH's fans left with RH9, I believe RH is still running strong and should be looked at by linux newcomers and RH professionals alike.
The latest version of Fedora is Core 3, and the latest RHEL is 4.SuSE has always been the clear alternative to RH for the desktop and server alike. With they're recent purchase by Novell, SuSE may even begin to rival RH's support.
It's always been one of the more user-friendly distributions out there (We all love Geeko;) however, since it's recent purchase by Novell, the popular german distro has made a turn for the business side. Like RH, SuSE divided it's OS into mini editions, the workstation edition and the server edition.
Another aspect of SuSE is it's massive flexability. It is pre-loaded with support for nearly every accessory (graphics + sound cards, gigabit switches, etc.) support for tablets, 64-bit i386, SPARC, and almost everything else you can think of.
Although I will confess to only using it for less than a week, I still think its an awesome distro.
The latest version of SuSE Linux (all branches) is 9.3Mandrake was originally a branch off of Red Hat 6.x, however it has since become its complete own distribution.
Mandrakesoft markets four personal distrobutions of MDK 10.0; Discovery pack (basic), Powerpack (medium), Powerpack+ (highest version), and the Download (free) version. I downloaded and burnt the free edition for my evaluation.
The free version said it wouldn't have support for some modems (Like RTC and ADSL) or some video cards (like ATI and NVIDIA), however it worked just fine for both of
my boxes. (2.7 GHz Celeron, 256 Mb ram, 80 gig 7200 rpm Maxtor Hard Drive, Intel motherboard, built in Ethernet, GPU and SPU)/(1.0 GHz PIII-M (Coppermine), 512 ram, 30 gig IBM Travelstar HD, Intel Ethernet, ATI Rage Mobility GPU, ESS Maestro IIE sound card, ORiNOCO classic gold wlan card, etc.)
Mandrake has, in my view, never really been that big in the Linux distro wars, however MDK 10 changed my mind completely.
As a Red Hat/Fedora Guru, my first impression was that it seemed almost exactly like FC2. A closer inspection revealed quite a few differences; such as a better update agent GUI. Dispite their similarities, FC2 and MDK10 are also different in many ways. FC is based on the concept of a completely free, very functional desktop OS, while MDK is based on choice. FC ships with the KDE, GNOME and xfce window managers, while MDK uses KDE, GNOME, WindowMaker, Enlightenment, BlackBox and IceWM. Mandy also has a better, cleaner, more revised update agent GUI (rpmdrake/urpmi) that dwarfs FC's up2date. The command line version (urpmi) however, kinda pales in comparison to RH's yum.
In conclusion; Red Hat fans will feel very at home in Mandrake; and it should be considered almost like an alternate FC. It also would be probably oe of the best starter Linux distros, as it has all kinds of fancy things that happen in the backround for you, ike automatic mounting of hard discs, floppy drives, CD drives, card readers, USB memory cards and so on. It also detects and configures a lot of your hardware by
itself, insted of asking you to do it (it does this as a failsafe). Although it may be one of the easiest distros to use, this may also be a handicap to someone who used it first, as they wouldn't know what to do when thrown into FC, Gentoo, or any of the more traditional, manual distros. Still, it's done quite well and is one of the best distros to show to the win'dooze n00biez we're all haunted by.
Unfortunantly, this isnt exactly true anymore.
THis review was written after the evaluation of MDK10.0, and suddenly in 10.1 MDK just decided to suck. I dont know how, I dont know why, but practically everything good about it that I liked it for is just..... gone. Suddenly its slow, bloated, error-prone, and overated.
The newest version of MandrakeLinux (all branches) is 10.1.FreeBSD is actualy not Linux, but BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution); another UNIX-y derivative. It is, however, not at all uncharted waters for Linux users. The usability of BSD isn't exactly fabulous, but not that hard to figure out (just remember it isn't FC and you'll be fine.) Gentoo users (such as myself) will feel right at home in FBSD. Almost... too at home. [more on this later]
The installer is, well, very quirky and awkward (not buggy, just
weird). Well, I think it is anyway.
FreeBSD's
true strength, however, lies in it's speed. It's got one of the fastest boot speeds I've ever encountered!
One of FreeBSD's coolest featues is the package manager. It's knows as the 'ports' system. In a later revision I'll document this and how it operates completely, but for now just google that.
As I said before, Gentoo users will feel right at home. Mostly because Portage is just a rip off of the FBSD ports system.
Although I must admit my experiences and knowlage about FBSD is minimalistic, I would not reccomend FreeBSD to the average user. It is, however, one of the best Server OSs out there. (some would say the best.... I wouldn't argue.)
The latest version of FreeBSD is 5.3Ok this is one of my personal favorites. A while ago (2001) Apple decided that it's litte child (Mac OS 9) wasn't doing too well in school so to speak, and abandoned it completely. To me this would sound quite drastic, but the result was so fabulous I would never argue with it. Basically, OS X was the brainchild of some Open Source enthusiast Apple employee who decided that the MacOS just didn't cut it.
So they trashed it.
And cloned one of the smarter kids.
That's right; OS X is really BSD.
Apple took the BSD filesystem, the Mach 3 kernal, the Aqua interface, and Poof! you have OS X. Thay successfully merged the power and speed of a server OS with the simpel usability and driver support of a home OS. This resulted in a beauty that's usability surpasses even that of Windows, power is right up there with Linux and BSD, and the sleek look of the Aqua interface. Beautiful.
Although OS X only runs on PPC, there is a version of it's Darwin core, called
OpenDarwin, that has been ported to i386. I've used OS X and OD 7.2.1 (ix86), but never for that long, so I can't give so much of a review for this one. However, I do know that recently Apple has helped embed
X11 into OS X, so it can now run most Linux programs. Anyone who thinks compatibility is an issue should take a little trip to a couple sites like
linuxsoft.cz or
rpm.pbone.net and then even
try to tell me there are more free programs for winDoze.
The latest version of MacOS X is 10.3 (10.4 is still a beta), and the latest version of it's Darwin core is 7.2.// Please don't attack my views on any of these reviews, I'm just posting what I believe.
// If you think I have made an incorrect statement, please comment and I will change it accordingly.